Background and objective: Assessment of oxygenation in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is critical for treatment. The accuracy of percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) determined by pulse oximetry is uncertain, and it has limited value in patients receiving supplemental oxygen. We hypothesized that calculation of partial arterial oxygen concentration/inspired oxygen faction (PaO2 /FiO2 ) from SpO2 by the Ellis or Rice equations might adequately correlate with PaO2 /FiO2 measured by arterial blood gases.
Methods: We studied 1004 patients with pneumonia in the emergency department with simultaneous measurement of SpO2 and PaO2 from two cohorts from Valencia, Spain and Utah, USA. We compared SpO2 with measured SaO2 , compared the equations' accuracy in calculating PaO2 /FiO2 and determined how often patients would be misclassified at clinically important thresholds. We compared estimated PaO2 /FiO2 to measured PaO2 /FiO2 using the Spearman correlation.
Results: Pairwise correlation of SpO2 with SaO2 was moderate (rho = 0.66; P < 0.01). Both equations performed similarly among patients with lower PaO2 /FiO2 ratios. The Ellis equation estimated PaO2 /FiO2 from SpO2 more accurately than the Rice equation in patients with PaO2 /FiO2 ≥200. Simple agreement between calculated and measured P/F was 91% and 92%, respectively.
Conclusions: The Ellis equation was more accurate than the Rice equation for estimating PaO2 /FiO2 , especially at higher levels of P/F ratio. Estimation of PaO2 /FiO2 from SpO2 is accurate enough for initial oxygenation assessment. Ellis and Rice equations could misclassify 20% and 30% of patients, respectively, at higher levels of PaO2 /FiO2 . For patients with abnormal oxygenation falling near thresholds for clinical decision making, arterial blood gas measurement preferably on room air is more accurate.
Keywords: arterial blood gas; community-acquired pneumonia; emergency department; oxygen saturation; partial arterial oxygen concentration/inspired oxygen faction.
Oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/Fio2 (SF) ratio is highly correlated with the Pao2/Fio2(PF) ratio in patients with ARDS. However, it remains uncertain whether SF ratio can be substituted for PF ratio for diagnosis of ARDS and whether SF ratio might identify patients who are systemically different from patients diagnosed by PF ratio.
We conducted a secondary analysis of a large observational prospective cohort study. Patients were eligible if they were admitted to the medical ICU and fulfilled the Berlin definition of ARDS with hypoxemia criteria using either the standard PF threshold (PF ratio ≤ 300) or a previously published SF threshold (SF ratio ≤ 315).
Of 362 patients with ARDS, 238 (66%) received a diagnosis by PF ratio and 124 (34%) by SF ratio. In a small group of patients who received diagnoses of ARDS by SF ratio who had arterial blood gas measurements on the same day (n = 10), the PF ratio did not meet ARDS criteria. There were no major differences in clinical characteristics or comorbidities between groups with the exception of APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II scores, which were higher in the group diagnosed by PF ratio. However, this difference was no longer apparent when arterial blood gas-dependent variables (pH, Pao2) were removed from the APACHE II score. There were also no differences in clinical outcomes including duration of mechanical ventilation (mean, 7 days in both groups; P = .25), duration of ICU stay (mean, 10 days vs 9 days in PF ratio vs SF ratio; P = .26), or hospital mortality (36% in both groups, P = .9).
Patients with ARDS diagnosed by SF ratio have very similar clinical characteristics and outcomes compared with patients diagnosed by PF ratio. These findings suggest that SF ratio could be considered as a diagnostic tool for early enrollment into clinical trials.
Abstract
This review article describes two protocols adapted from lung ultrasound: the bedside lung ultrasound in emergency (BLUE)-protocol for the immediate diagnosis of acute respiratory failure and the fluid administration limited by lung sonography (FALLS)-protocol for the management of acute circulatory failure. These applications require the mastery of 10 signs indicating normal lung surface (bat sign, lung sliding, A-lines), pleural effusions (quad and sinusoid sign), lung consolidations (fractal and tissue-like sign), interstitial syndrome (lung rockets), and pneumothorax (stratosphere sign and the lung point). These signs have been assessed in adults, with diagnostic accuracies ranging from 90% to 100%, allowing consideration of ultrasound as a reasonable bedside gold standard. In the BLUE-protocol, profiles have been designed for the main diseases (pneumonia, congestive heart failure, COPD, asthma, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax), with an accuracy > 90%. In the FALLS-protocol, the change from A-lines to lung rockets appears at a threshold of 18 mm Hg of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, providing a direct biomarker of clinical volemia. The FALLS-protocol sequentially rules out obstructive, then cardiogenic, then hypovolemic shock for expediting the diagnosis of distributive (usually septic) shock. These applications can be done using simple grayscale machines and one microconvex probe suitable for the whole body. Lung ultrasound is a multifaceted tool also useful for decreasing radiation doses (of interest in neonates where the lung signatures are similar to those in adults), from ARDS to trauma management, and from ICUs to points of care. If done in suitable centers, training is the least of the limitations for making use of this kind of visual medicine.
Oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/Fio2 (SF) ratio is highly correlated with the Pao2/Fio2(PF) ratio in patients with ARDS. However, it remains uncertain whether SF ratio can be substituted for PF ratio for diagnosis of ARDS and whether SF ratio might identify patients who are systemically different from patients diagnosed by PF ratio.
We conducted a secondary analysis of a large observational prospective cohort study. Patients were eligible if they were admitted to the medical ICU and fulfilled the Berlin definition of ARDS with hypoxemia criteria using either the standard PF threshold (PF ratio ≤ 300) or a previously published SF threshold (SF ratio ≤ 315).
Of 362 patients with ARDS, 238 (66%) received a diagnosis by PF ratio and 124 (34%) by SF ratio. In a small group of patients who received diagnoses of ARDS by SF ratio who had arterial blood gas measurements on the same day (n = 10), the PF ratio did not meet ARDS criteria. There were no major differences in clinical characteristics or comorbidities between groups with the exception of APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II scores, which were higher in the group diagnosed by PF ratio. However, this difference was no longer apparent when arterial blood gas-dependent variables (pH, Pao2) were removed from the APACHE II score. There were also no differences in clinical outcomes including duration of mechanical ventilation (mean, 7 days in both groups; P = .25), duration of ICU stay (mean, 10 days vs 9 days in PF ratio vs SF ratio; P = .26), or hospital mortality (36% in both groups, P = .9).
Patients with ARDS diagnosed by SF ratio have very similar clinical characteristics and outcomes compared with patients diagnosed by PF ratio. These findings suggest that SF ratio could be considered as a diagnostic tool for early enrollment into clinical trials.