Ссылка на сайте суда/Link on the court's website
Verdict
A decision was passed to terminate the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense
Count6
1
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/zelenogradskij/services/cases/admin/details/6a358e40-d7d6-11eb-8178-dfb4ef517ebd
2
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/zelenogradskij/services/cases/admin/details/f95f67e0-db09-11eb-90c1-a95323b15270
3
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/zelenogradskij/services/cases/admin/details/2fc30270-db09-11eb-90c1-a95323b15270
4
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/zelenogradskij/services/cases/admin/details/b1e5c9a0-db08-11eb-90c1-a95323b15270
5
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/zelenogradskij/services/cases/admin/details/1fedbf60-d7d6-11eb-8178-dfb4ef517ebd
6
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/zelenogradskij/services/cases/admin/details/1415abe0-d014-11eb-a26a-2b8c2023e38a
7
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/perovskij/services/cases/admin/details/024e3b10-cdb8-11eb-b49b-df096393c83a
8
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/perovskij/services/cases/admin/details/628e0f70-bc68-11eb-bf9e-cf0a173531fb
9
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/perovskij/services/cases/admin/details/00bd0600-b7ba-11eb-b248-3955a0784640
10
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/zelenogradskij/services/cases/admin/details/cb238990-b496-11eb-9236-a928dc8e8e01
11
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/perovskij/services/cases/admin/details/21190080-ae77-11eb-8303-1d5a182ab0c1
12
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/perovskij/services/cases/admin/details/9af82620-a994-11eb-a4de-bd7ea0300c94
13
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/kuncevskij/services/cases/admin/details/cc1f89d0-cdd1-11eb-b46f-6f0264a65964
14
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/izmajlovskij/services/cases/admin/details/b99936e0-c835-11eb-9712-cfa93d81048d
15
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/perovskij/services/cases/admin/details/86e10d50-b7bd-11eb-aeef-39a404e7b917
16
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/butyrskij/services/cases/admin/details/c8375860-b491-11eb-9430-c5132205cf2d
Verdict
Returned
Count10
Drag to adjust the number of frozen columns
Court
Verdict
Articles
Detained at the rally
Date of the hearing
Defendant's position
Arguments: identification and video
Arguments: Witness testimony
Arguments: procedural violations
Other arguments
The Zelenograd District Court of Moscow
A decision was passed to terminate the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
2021-07-16
did not participate in the protests
the identity was not established at the place of the offense
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
the police did not interview the defendant
The Zelenograd District Court of Moscow
A decision was passed to terminate the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
2021-07-16
did not show up
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
the identity was not established at the place of the offense
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
the police did not interview the defendant
The Zelenograd District Court of Moscow
A decision was passed to terminate the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
2021-07-16
did not show up
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
the identity was not established at the place of the offense
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
the police did not interview the defendant
The Zelenograd District Court of Moscow
A decision was passed to terminate the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
2021-07-16
did not show up
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
the identity was not established at the place of the offense
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
the police did not interview the defendant
The Zelenograd District Court of Moscow
A decision was passed to terminate the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
2021-07-16
did not participate in the protests
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
the identity was not established at the place of the offense
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
the police did not interview the defendant
The Zelenograd District Court of Moscow
A decision was passed to terminate the proceedings on the case of an administrative offense
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
2021-06-18
did not participate in the protests
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
the identity was not established at the place of the offense
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
the police did not interview the defendant
The Perovsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 6.1 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
the police did not identify for the court which person in the video is the defendant
the court itself has no means of identification
the authors of the report were not present when the offense took place
did not participate in the issuing of the report
there is no confirmation of the notification about the issue of the report
The Perovsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
did not participate in the protests
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
the authors of the report were not present when the offense took place
The Perovsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
did not participate in the protests
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
the court itself has no means of identification
the police did not identify for the court which person in the video is the defendant
the authors of the report were not present when the offense took place
The Zelenograd District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
did not participate in the protests
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
the police did not interview the defendant
The Perovsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
the police did not identify for the court which person in the video is the defendant
the court itself has no means of identification
the authors of the report were not present when the offense took place
did not participate in the issuing of the report
there is no confirmation of the notification about the issue of the report
a copy of the report was not sent
Written explanations in the case are not from a witness, but from a neighbor - there are no eyewitnesses + It is impossible to determine from the report whether Seregina D.R. appeared before the official for the issuing of the report, whether the relevant rights were explained to her, whether she was familiarized with this report or refused to sign this document
The Perovsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
no
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
the police did not identify for the court which person in the video is the defendant
the court itself has no means of identification
the authors of the report were not present when the offense took place
did not participate in the issuing of the report
there is no confirmation of the notification about the issue of the report
a copy of the report was not sent
The neighbor's written explanation does not correspond to the criteria of admissibility of the presented evidence, since it does not follow from it that her rights were explained to the specified person and this person was warned of responsibility for giving deliberately false testimony. In addition, it follows from the content of these explanations that they were only given after the fact of the search by police officers of ......full name, whom she sees extremely rarely.
The Kuntsevsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
unknown
did not participate in the protests
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
the police did not identify for the court which person in the video is the defendant
The Izmailovsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
unknown
pleaded not guilty
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
it is not established when and at what address the video was recorded
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
the police did not identify for the court which person in the video is the defendant
no witnesses of the offense have been identified
There is no information in the case file about whether a notification about the public event was received by the Moscow Government - this is a legally significant circumstance, subject to being clarified for the present case and relevant for its proper resolution, which in violation of the requirements of the articles 24.1, 26.1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses was left by the official who issued the protocol on the administrative offense without attention, examination and evaluation
The Perovsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
unknown
no specific sources of identification of citizens in the video were provided
it does not follow from the video that a rally took place (passers-by walk along the sidewalk)
the police did not identify for the court which person in the video is the defendant
the court itself has no means of identification
did not participate in the issuing of the report
there is no confirmation of the notification about the issue of the report
The only fact that follow from the reports is that of repeated visits of a police officer to the address in order to establish the whereabouts
The Butyrsky District Court of Moscow
Returned
Part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
unknown
did not participate in the protests
the identity was not established at the place of the offense
it has not been proven that the person in the video and in the court are the same
the police did not interview the defendant
witnesses of the offense were not interviewed
16 records

Alert

Lorem ipsum
Okay
View larger version
Download CSV